Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Balanced Scorecard (BSC) untuk Perusahaan Konstruks
Balanced Scorecard (BSC) merupakan instrumen sistem manajemen strategi yang dapat dipakai untuk memetakan strategi, menselaraskan strategi dengan proses bisnis konstruksi dan melaksanakan atau mengeksekusi strategi. Instrumen ini diperkenalkan oleh Kaplan & Norton (1992) dan sudah diadopsi luas oleh banyak perusahaan di berbagai sektor industri.
Bagaimana dengan sektor konstruksi? Apakah instrumen ini juga banyak diterapkan oleh para konsultan atau kontraktor di Indonesia? Indikator-indikator ukuran apa saja yang khas digunakan pada perusahaan konstruksi?
BSC juga dapat diapakai untuk mengukur kinerja industri konstruksi, di mana semua pelaku industri dimetrikkan berdasarkan inisiatif dan sasaran strategisnya masing-masing untuk mencapai visi dan misi industri konstruksi nasional. Indikator kinerja ini diperlukan untuk memetakan dan sekaligus mengukur kinerja industri konstruksi Indonesia berdasarkan unsur-unsur LPJK Nasional atau sebagai program strategis dari Pembina Konstruksi dalam hal ini Departmene Pekerjaan Umum
Jika berminat dengan topik penelitian ini, silahkan kontak saya.
Sunday, June 03, 2012
Indonesia Infrastructure Report Q3 2012 (14 May)
We have revised down our 2012 construction forecasts for Indonesia, with real growth expected to reach around 6.9% in 2012 (previously 7.1%). This revision is primarily due to a government plan to cut fuel subsidies, which we believe is likely to reverse the conducive monetary conditions for construction activity. In addition, we believe there is a real risk that Indonesia's construction sector could fail to realise its long-term growth potential, as key regulatory reforms have either failed to transpire or been overturned We believe that these negative factors could lead to a lack of private investment and have thus revised down our forecast for annual average construction real growth between 2013 and 2016 to 7.7% (previously 7.9%).
Key factors that will facilitate growth include:
In January 2012, PLN announced that it has identified 96 locations that are suitable for new hydroelectric power plants across the country, reports thejakartapost.com. PLN will develop 60% of the proposed facilities, with the remaining 40% to be offered to independent power producers (IPP) through a series of tenders. The power plants will have a total production capacity of 12,800MW.
In February 2012, the Indonesian government announced that it will undertake a feasibility study for the proposed US$13.9bn Sunda Strait bridge project during 2012. However, the government said that it would only pay IDR1.5trn (US$164mn), equivalent to 1%, of the project's total cost for the feasibility study. The 31km bridge will run between Anyer on the island of Java to Bakauheni on the island of Sumatra and be the largest inter-island edifice in the country. Construction is scheduled to start in 2014 and the bridge is expected to be operational by 2025. The development of the project is led by the consortium PT Graha Lampung Banten Sejahtera.
In March 2012, PLN announced plans to launch a tender for the IDR20trn (US$2.18bn) Sumatra-Java high-voltage-direct current interconnected project in April 2012. Construction is expected to start in 2013, with completion scheduled for 2017. Once completed, the system is expected to distribute 3GW of electricity from Sumatra to Java and Bali Island, or vice versa. The project involves the construction of a converter station in Muara Enim [South Sumatra] and an inverter station in Bogor [West Java]. The line will be used to supply power from South Sumatra to fulfil the rising demand for power in Java, with several coal-fired power plants being built in the former region.
Reference: Indonesia Infrastructure Report © Business Monitor International Ltd.
Monday, August 22, 2011
Indonesia Infrastructure Report Q4 2011
Executive Summary
Indonesia’s construction industry achieved lower-than-expected growth rates in the first quarter of 2011, prompting us to downwardly revise our full-year real growth forecasts for the sector to 6.3% in 2011 (previously 7.4%). We believe that this weaker growth is due to the rising cost of inputs and the fact there has been no resolution with regard to problems with regulatory issues in the construction sector. While the rate of inflation is likely to ease in the second half of this year, regulatory issues are unlikely to be resolved quickly, and this could have ramifications for the growth potential in the construction sector over the long term. Nevertheless, construction activity, driven by investment into transport and energy infrastructure, as well as industrial construction related to the country's growing mining sector, is expected to be relatively robust between 2012 and 2015, averaging 7.3% per annum.
Reference
Indonesia Infrastructure Report Q4 2011, © Business Monitor International Ltd.
Indonesia’s construction industry achieved lower-than-expected growth rates in the first quarter of 2011, prompting us to downwardly revise our full-year real growth forecasts for the sector to 6.3% in 2011 (previously 7.4%). We believe that this weaker growth is due to the rising cost of inputs and the fact there has been no resolution with regard to problems with regulatory issues in the construction sector. While the rate of inflation is likely to ease in the second half of this year, regulatory issues are unlikely to be resolved quickly, and this could have ramifications for the growth potential in the construction sector over the long term. Nevertheless, construction activity, driven by investment into transport and energy infrastructure, as well as industrial construction related to the country's growing mining sector, is expected to be relatively robust between 2012 and 2015, averaging 7.3% per annum.
Reference
Indonesia Infrastructure Report Q4 2011, © Business Monitor International Ltd.
Sunday, August 07, 2011
Indonesia Infrastructure Report Q3 2011
EXCEUTIVE SUMMARY
BMI View: Indonesia’s construction industry has been experiencing exceptionally high levels of inflation over recent years; however, despite this trend real growth has been high, averaging 7.6% per year between 2003 and 2010. Although these high levels of inflation are expected to continue over the forecast period (2010-2015), the construction industry is still anticipated to post high real growth, reflecting the high levels of anticipated activity. This is being driven by investment into transport and energy infrastructure, as well as industrial construction related to the country's growing mining sector. In 2011 we are forecasting construction industry growth of 7.4%, and between 2011 and 2015 we are forecasting growth to average 8.1% per year.
Key factors that will facilitate growth include:
�� The Indonesian government is looking at issuing Islamic bonds to meet its financing needs. In January 2011, Bloomberg reported that the finance ministry had proposed to the Indonesian shari'a board – Majelis Ulama Indonesia – that revenues from new road and rail projects (due to be built over the next three years) should be used to repay Islamic bonds.
�� In December 2010, Japan signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) with Indonesia for the development of around US$24bn worth of infrastructure projects in the Jakarta Metropolitan Priority Area (MPA). However, the recent devastation wrought by the Tohoku Pacific earthquake that hit Japan on March 11 2011 has raised significant uncertainty about the future destination of Japanese investment and the project could now be delayed.
�� In March 2011, the Indonesian government announced that it may offer 16 infrastructure projects worth US$32bn to investors in April 2011. These 16 projects are to be offered under a public private partnership (PPP) framework and would focus on a wide variety of infrastructure developments; ie toll roads, bridges, railways, seaports, power plants, water treatment facilities and cruise terminals. However, only five of the 16 projects are currently ready for investment.
Indonesia’s business environment remains a downside risk for investors. Although the Indonesian government is working hard to attract private investors, there is still an underlying threat of corruption and a lack of transparency in infrastructure tenders. The biggest concern is that Indonesia appears to be regressing in its fight against corruption, with a raft of proposals – that if approved – would undermine current anti graft laws. This culminates in a score of just 55.6 out of 100 for infrastructure business environment.
Reference
Indonesia Infrastructure Report Q3 2011
BMI View: Indonesia’s construction industry has been experiencing exceptionally high levels of inflation over recent years; however, despite this trend real growth has been high, averaging 7.6% per year between 2003 and 2010. Although these high levels of inflation are expected to continue over the forecast period (2010-2015), the construction industry is still anticipated to post high real growth, reflecting the high levels of anticipated activity. This is being driven by investment into transport and energy infrastructure, as well as industrial construction related to the country's growing mining sector. In 2011 we are forecasting construction industry growth of 7.4%, and between 2011 and 2015 we are forecasting growth to average 8.1% per year.
Key factors that will facilitate growth include:
�� The Indonesian government is looking at issuing Islamic bonds to meet its financing needs. In January 2011, Bloomberg reported that the finance ministry had proposed to the Indonesian shari'a board – Majelis Ulama Indonesia – that revenues from new road and rail projects (due to be built over the next three years) should be used to repay Islamic bonds.
�� In December 2010, Japan signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) with Indonesia for the development of around US$24bn worth of infrastructure projects in the Jakarta Metropolitan Priority Area (MPA). However, the recent devastation wrought by the Tohoku Pacific earthquake that hit Japan on March 11 2011 has raised significant uncertainty about the future destination of Japanese investment and the project could now be delayed.
�� In March 2011, the Indonesian government announced that it may offer 16 infrastructure projects worth US$32bn to investors in April 2011. These 16 projects are to be offered under a public private partnership (PPP) framework and would focus on a wide variety of infrastructure developments; ie toll roads, bridges, railways, seaports, power plants, water treatment facilities and cruise terminals. However, only five of the 16 projects are currently ready for investment.
Indonesia’s business environment remains a downside risk for investors. Although the Indonesian government is working hard to attract private investors, there is still an underlying threat of corruption and a lack of transparency in infrastructure tenders. The biggest concern is that Indonesia appears to be regressing in its fight against corruption, with a raft of proposals – that if approved – would undermine current anti graft laws. This culminates in a score of just 55.6 out of 100 for infrastructure business environment.
Reference
Indonesia Infrastructure Report Q3 2011
Sunday, March 06, 2011
Daftar Rencana Topik Penelitian S2 (Magister)
Berikut ini adalah daftar rencana topik-topik penelitian untuk tugas akhir atau thesis untuk program magister (S2) pada program magister "manajemen konstruksi" atau "manajemen proyek" :
1. Asset dan Kapabilitas Teknologi dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
2. Asset dan Kapabilitas Inovasi/Komplementer dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
3. Asset dan Kapabilitas Keuangan dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
4. Asset dan Kapabilitas Reputasi dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
5. Asset dan Kapabilitas Struktur dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
6. Asset dan Kapabilitas Institusional dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
7. Asset dan Kapabilitas Pasar/Posisi dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
Rencana penelitian ini merupakan lanjutan dari studi penelitian dari disertasi tentang manajemen strategik pada perusahaan konstruksi di Indonesia yang mengacu kepada paradigma strategi bisnis yaitu kapabilitas dinamis (dynamic capabilities framework) yang digagas oleh David Teece (1990,1994, 1997, 2007, 2009).
Kepada yang berminat terhadap topik-topik di atas, silahkan kontak ke mspamulu@gmail.com untuk diskusi lebih lanjut. Terima kasih atas perhatiannya
1. Asset dan Kapabilitas Teknologi dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
2. Asset dan Kapabilitas Inovasi/Komplementer dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
3. Asset dan Kapabilitas Keuangan dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
4. Asset dan Kapabilitas Reputasi dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
5. Asset dan Kapabilitas Struktur dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
6. Asset dan Kapabilitas Institusional dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
7. Asset dan Kapabilitas Pasar/Posisi dalam hubungannya dengan keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja lestari perusahaan
Rencana penelitian ini merupakan lanjutan dari studi penelitian dari disertasi tentang manajemen strategik pada perusahaan konstruksi di Indonesia yang mengacu kepada paradigma strategi bisnis yaitu kapabilitas dinamis (dynamic capabilities framework) yang digagas oleh David Teece (1990,1994, 1997, 2007, 2009).
Kepada yang berminat terhadap topik-topik di atas, silahkan kontak ke mspamulu@gmail.com untuk diskusi lebih lanjut. Terima kasih atas perhatiannya
Monday, January 31, 2011
Indonesia Infrastructure Report 2011
Executive Summary
Indonesia’s construction industry value is expanding rapidly, a trend forecast to continue over our newly extended forecast period (2010-2020). This is being driven by investment into both transport and energy infrastructure, as well as industrial construction related to the country’s growing mining sector. In 2010 we are forecasting construction industry growth of 5.7%, and between 2011 and 2015 we are forecasting growth to average 7.2% per year. This quarter we have added a new section covering residential, commercial and industrial construction as well as social infrastructure.
Key factors facilitating growth:
• Indonesian government’s efforts to attract private investment into infrastructure. The government has employed a number of tools and enacted a variety of measures to facilitate investments and increase the number of public private partnerships (PPPs). Measures include the creation of the Indonesia Infrastructure Fund, designed to provide an alternative source of funding for infrastructure projects. Measures related to land issues are also being implemented, as land clearance is one of the major barriers to the country's investment climate.
• Strong and growing Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). FDI in Indonesia has grown substantially over recent years, from US$6bn in 2006 to US$10.8bn in 2009, according to the Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board. This trend looks set to continue in 2010, with first quarter figures rising by 41% year-on-year (y-o-y) to US$3.92bn. Strong sectors for investment continued to be the transport, storage and communications industry, which recorded US$941.5mn investment for 23 projects and the mining sector, which attracted US$711mn for 12 projects. Both of these sectors demand supporting infrastructure, and investment into the sectors has buoyed the construction sector.
• Substantial investment plan for the power sector by state owned utility PLN. PLN is enacting a two phase ‘crash programme’ to expand electricity generating capacity, with each phase adding 10,000MW of capacity. PLN was targeting investments of US$7.9bn in 2010 and a further US$9.8bn for 2011.
• Transport infrastructure is receiving substantial attention, specifically freight networks. With heavy investment into the mining sector, accompanying railways and ports are being developed to export coal. Billions of dollars of investments in railways have been pledged in 2010, driving transport infrastructure growth over the next five years.
Despite a strong outlook, a number of factors could undercut prospects for growth. The first is very high inflation in the construction sector, driven by rising construction materials prices. According to a recent study of 11 countries in Asia, Indonesia had the fourth highest cement price in the region. Indeed, a 50kg bag of cement in East Java costs almost double what it would in China, according to the Jakarta Post.
With cement costs accounting for around 30% of project costs, the impact is notable. The main reason for the higher prices has been blamed on transport and distribution costs, and the uncertain electricity supply in the country is bound to have an impact. There are also concerns of collusion between cement makers, limiting production to drive prices higher. High prices could erode real value creation and if costs run too high, projects could become unfeasible financially.
The other threat is the business environment. Although the Indonesian government is working hard to attract private investors, there is still an underlying threat of corruption and transparency in tendering infrastructure. This culminates in a score of just 54.6 out of 100 for infrastructure business environment and 35.8 out of 100 for project finance ratings.
Ref. © 2010 Business Monitor International: Indonesia Infrastructure Report Q1 2011
Indonesia’s construction industry value is expanding rapidly, a trend forecast to continue over our newly extended forecast period (2010-2020). This is being driven by investment into both transport and energy infrastructure, as well as industrial construction related to the country’s growing mining sector. In 2010 we are forecasting construction industry growth of 5.7%, and between 2011 and 2015 we are forecasting growth to average 7.2% per year. This quarter we have added a new section covering residential, commercial and industrial construction as well as social infrastructure.
Key factors facilitating growth:
• Indonesian government’s efforts to attract private investment into infrastructure. The government has employed a number of tools and enacted a variety of measures to facilitate investments and increase the number of public private partnerships (PPPs). Measures include the creation of the Indonesia Infrastructure Fund, designed to provide an alternative source of funding for infrastructure projects. Measures related to land issues are also being implemented, as land clearance is one of the major barriers to the country's investment climate.
• Strong and growing Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). FDI in Indonesia has grown substantially over recent years, from US$6bn in 2006 to US$10.8bn in 2009, according to the Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board. This trend looks set to continue in 2010, with first quarter figures rising by 41% year-on-year (y-o-y) to US$3.92bn. Strong sectors for investment continued to be the transport, storage and communications industry, which recorded US$941.5mn investment for 23 projects and the mining sector, which attracted US$711mn for 12 projects. Both of these sectors demand supporting infrastructure, and investment into the sectors has buoyed the construction sector.
• Substantial investment plan for the power sector by state owned utility PLN. PLN is enacting a two phase ‘crash programme’ to expand electricity generating capacity, with each phase adding 10,000MW of capacity. PLN was targeting investments of US$7.9bn in 2010 and a further US$9.8bn for 2011.
• Transport infrastructure is receiving substantial attention, specifically freight networks. With heavy investment into the mining sector, accompanying railways and ports are being developed to export coal. Billions of dollars of investments in railways have been pledged in 2010, driving transport infrastructure growth over the next five years.
Despite a strong outlook, a number of factors could undercut prospects for growth. The first is very high inflation in the construction sector, driven by rising construction materials prices. According to a recent study of 11 countries in Asia, Indonesia had the fourth highest cement price in the region. Indeed, a 50kg bag of cement in East Java costs almost double what it would in China, according to the Jakarta Post.
With cement costs accounting for around 30% of project costs, the impact is notable. The main reason for the higher prices has been blamed on transport and distribution costs, and the uncertain electricity supply in the country is bound to have an impact. There are also concerns of collusion between cement makers, limiting production to drive prices higher. High prices could erode real value creation and if costs run too high, projects could become unfeasible financially.
The other threat is the business environment. Although the Indonesian government is working hard to attract private investors, there is still an underlying threat of corruption and transparency in tendering infrastructure. This culminates in a score of just 54.6 out of 100 for infrastructure business environment and 35.8 out of 100 for project finance ratings.
Ref. © 2010 Business Monitor International: Indonesia Infrastructure Report Q1 2011
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: A STUDY OF INDONESIAN ENTERPRISES
Since the establishment of the first national strategic development plan in the early 1970s, the construction industry has played an important role in terms of the economic, social and cultural development of Indonesia. The industry’s contribution to Indonesia’s GDP increased from 3.9% in 1973 to 7.7% in 2007. Business Monitoring International (2009) forecasts that Indonesia is home to one of the fastest-growing construction industries in Asia despite the average construction growth rate being expected to remain under 10% over the period 2006 – 2010. Similarly, Howlett (2009) places Indonesia as one of the 20 largest construction markets in 2010.
Although the prospects of the Indonesian construction industry have become attractive and very promising, many local construction firms still face serious difficulties, such as poor performance and low competitiveness. There are two main reasons behind the problem: the environment that they face is not favourable; the other is the lack of strategic direction to improve competitiveness and performance. Meanwhile, although strategic management has now become more widely used by many large construction firms in developed countries, practical cases or empirical findings related to the Indonesian construction industry remain scarce. In addition, research endeavours related to these topics in developing countries appear to be limited. This has potentially become one of the factors hampering efforts to guide Indonesian construction enterprises.
This research aims to construct a conceptual model to enable Indonesian construction enterprises to develop sound long-term corporate strategy that generates competitive advantage and superior performance. The conceptual model seeks to address the main prescription of a dynamic capabilities framework (Teece et al., 1997; Teece, 2007) within the context of the Indonesian construction industry. It is hypothesised that in a rapidly changing and varied environment, competitive success arises from the continuous development and reconfiguration of firm specific assets achieving competitive advantage not only dependent on the exploitation of specific assets/capabilities, but on the exploitation of all of the assets and capabilities combinations in the dynamic capabilities framework. Thus, the model is refined through sequential statistical regression analyses of survey results with a sample size of 120 valid responses.
The results of this study provide empirical evidence in support of the notion that a competitive advantage is achieved via the implementation of a dynamic capability framework as an important way for a construction enterprise to improve its organisational performance. The characteristics of asset-capability combinations were found to be significant determinants of the competitive advantage of the Indonesian construction enterprises, and that such advantage sequentially contributes to organisational performance. As dynamic capabilities framework can work in the context of Indonesia, it suggests that the framework has potential applicability in other emerging and developing countries. This study also demonstrates the importance of multi-stage nature of the model which provides a rich understanding of the dynamic process by which asset-capability should be exploited in combination by the construction firms operating in varying levels of hostility. Such findings are believed to provide useful to both academics and practitioners, however, as this research represents dynamic capabilities framework at the enterprise level, future studies should continue to explore and examine the framework in other levels of strategic management in construction as well as in other countries where different culture or similar condition prevails.
Although the prospects of the Indonesian construction industry have become attractive and very promising, many local construction firms still face serious difficulties, such as poor performance and low competitiveness. There are two main reasons behind the problem: the environment that they face is not favourable; the other is the lack of strategic direction to improve competitiveness and performance. Meanwhile, although strategic management has now become more widely used by many large construction firms in developed countries, practical cases or empirical findings related to the Indonesian construction industry remain scarce. In addition, research endeavours related to these topics in developing countries appear to be limited. This has potentially become one of the factors hampering efforts to guide Indonesian construction enterprises.
This research aims to construct a conceptual model to enable Indonesian construction enterprises to develop sound long-term corporate strategy that generates competitive advantage and superior performance. The conceptual model seeks to address the main prescription of a dynamic capabilities framework (Teece et al., 1997; Teece, 2007) within the context of the Indonesian construction industry. It is hypothesised that in a rapidly changing and varied environment, competitive success arises from the continuous development and reconfiguration of firm specific assets achieving competitive advantage not only dependent on the exploitation of specific assets/capabilities, but on the exploitation of all of the assets and capabilities combinations in the dynamic capabilities framework. Thus, the model is refined through sequential statistical regression analyses of survey results with a sample size of 120 valid responses.
The results of this study provide empirical evidence in support of the notion that a competitive advantage is achieved via the implementation of a dynamic capability framework as an important way for a construction enterprise to improve its organisational performance. The characteristics of asset-capability combinations were found to be significant determinants of the competitive advantage of the Indonesian construction enterprises, and that such advantage sequentially contributes to organisational performance. As dynamic capabilities framework can work in the context of Indonesia, it suggests that the framework has potential applicability in other emerging and developing countries. This study also demonstrates the importance of multi-stage nature of the model which provides a rich understanding of the dynamic process by which asset-capability should be exploited in combination by the construction firms operating in varying levels of hostility. Such findings are believed to provide useful to both academics and practitioners, however, as this research represents dynamic capabilities framework at the enterprise level, future studies should continue to explore and examine the framework in other levels of strategic management in construction as well as in other countries where different culture or similar condition prevails.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Dynamic Capabilities in Construction -- Interim Results for the 2009 Survey on Indonesian Construction Firms
I’m conducting a research survey as a part of my Ph.D study to elicit critical comments and feedback from Indonesian large construction firms regarding to their dynamic capabilities and industry specific factors that contribute business success in
UPDATE:
10 April 2009 – This summary was prepared for the 31 March 2009 online based result only, the paper based versions were not included and the result given here is now outdated
Please contact me on +61 402155808 or email if you would like more information or a copy of research results.
Thanks, M. Sapri Pamulu
Saturday, April 04, 2009
Top Global Contractors worked at Indonesia
| 1 | AMEC plc | 37 | KBR |
| 2 | B.L. Harbert International | 38 | Kinden Corp. |
| 3 | Balfour Beatty plc | 39 | Kumagai Gumi Co. Ltd. |
| 4 | Bauer AG | 40 | Leighton Holdings Ltd. |
| 5 | Black & Veatch | 41 | McConnell Dowell Corp. |
| 6 | BOUYGUES | 42 | McDermott International Inc. |
| 7 | Bovis Lend Lease | 43 | Obayashi Corp. |
| 8 | CB&I | 44 | Parsons |
| 9 | CEGELEC | 45 | Penta-Ocean Construction Co. Ltd. |
| 10 | Chengda Engineering Corp. of Cina | 46 | Petrofac Ltd. |
| 11 | | 47 | Punji Lloyd Ltd. |
| 12 | China Engineering Consultants Inc. | 48 | Royal BAM Group nv |
| 13 | China Gezhouba Group Co. Ltd. | 49 | RSEA Engineering Corp. |
| 14 | | 50 | Saipem |
| 15 | China National Chemical Eng'g Grp. Corp. | 51 | Samsung C&T Corp. |
| 16 | | 52 | SembCorp Engineers and Constructors |
| 17 | China National Machinery Indus. Corp. | 53 | SEPCOIII Electric Power Construction Corp. |
| 18 | | 54 | Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd. |
| 19 | | 55 | Sheladia Associates Inc. |
| 20 | China State Construction Eng'g Corp. | 56 | Shimizu Corp. |
| 21 | Chiyoda Corp. | 57 | Sinohydro Corp. |
| 22 | CITIC Construction Co. Ltd. | 58 | SK Engineering & Construction |
| 23 | Corrpro Cos. Inc. | 59 | Soletanche Bachy |
| 24 | COWI | 60 | SOLETANCHE BACHY |
| 25 | Daewoo Engineering Co. | 61 | Ssangyong Engineering & Constr. Co. Ltd. |
| 26 | Dongfang Electric Corp. | 62 | Sumitomo Mitsui Construction Co. Ltd. |
| 27 | Ebara Corp. | 63 | Taikisha Ltd. |
| 28 | Fichtner GmbH & Co. KG | 64 | Taisei Corp. |
| 29 | Fluor Corp. | 65 | Takenaka Corp. |
| 30 | Guangdong Xinguang Int'l Group | 66 | Techint Group |
| 31 | Hazama Corp. | 67 | TECHNIP |
| 32 | HOCHTIEF AG | 68 | The Shaw Group Inc. |
| 33 | Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. | 69 | Toyo Engineering Corp. |
| 34 | Jacobs | 70 | VINCI |
| 35 | JGC Corp. | 71 | Zhongding Int'l Engineering Co. Ltd. |
| 36 | Kajima Corp. | 72 | Zhongyuan Petroleum Exploration Bureau |
(Adapted from ENR 2006,2007,2008)
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Survey Bisnis Konstruksi Indonesia 2009 (Tahap 2)
Beberapa waktu lalu, suatu survei tahap-1 terkirim yang bermaksud mendapatkan masukan tentang dampak dari factor-faktor dan dan luar terhadap strategi bisnis konstruksi. Perusahaan anda termasuk dalam populasi dari perusahaan konstruksi yang beroperasi di Indonesia. Survei merupakan proyek penelitian mahasiswa pasca sarjana yang dibiayai oleh Queensland University of Technology Australia.
Jika anda telah menyelesaikan dan mengembalikan survey tersebut kepada kami, perkenankan kami mengucapkan terima kasih. Jika belum, sebagaimana Survey Tahap-2 ini merupakan survey tindak-lanjut dengan anda tentang survey sebelumnya, dan kami akan sangat menbghargai jika anda dapat melengkapi daftar pertanyaan hari ini. Kami memahami bahwa ini adalah waktu yang sangat menyibukkan tahun ini, tetapi adalah hal yang sangat penting bahwa informasi tentang asset dan kapabilitas perusahaan anda termasuk dalam studi kami untuk memberi gambaran yang luas tentang bisnis konstruksi yang beroperasi di Indonesia. Survei ini memerlukan waktu sekitar 15 - 30 menit untuk dilengkapi baik versi cetak (offline) maupun online versi Bahasa Indonesia dan English version
Untuk melengkapi survei ini, dimohon untuk memperhatikan instruksi sebagai berikut:
1. Survey ini akan mengkaji hubungan antara asset, kapabilititas dan kinerja perusahaan, kami menganjurkan untuk dengan singkat membaca semua faktor di Bagian Pertama, dan Daftar definisi yg tersedia sebelum membuat tanggapan akhir.
2. Untuk setiap item pertanyaan, mohon lingkari nomor yang tepat sesuai dengan jawaban anda. Terdapat tiga (3) bagian untuk diselesaikan ( Section/Bagian I, II, dan III)
3. Semua informasi dari sini akan diperlakukan dengan sangat rahasia. Semua data yang terkumpul akan dianalisa dan semua informasi tentang perusahaan/responden akan disimpan terpisah dari data survey.
4. Jika nada berkenan untuk menerima souvenir dan ringkasan hasil survey dari kami, mohon mengisi data respondend pada tempat yang tersedia di bagian akhir survey ini (hal.9).
5. Dimohon untuk melengkapi survey ini paling lambat pada hari Jumat, tanggal 25 April 2009 jika memungkinkan.. Survei yang telah diselesaikan agar dikirim melalu fax atau surat elektronik kepada M. Sapri Pamulu / Stephen Kajewski, BEE-QUT Brisbane, Australia 4001, Fax +61-7-31381170 (Internasional) or +62-21-7817235 (Lokal) atau email to m.pamulu@qut.edu.au
Terima kasih atas partisipasi dan kerjasamanya. M.Sapri Pamulu
Jika anda telah menyelesaikan dan mengembalikan survey tersebut kepada kami, perkenankan kami mengucapkan terima kasih. Jika belum, sebagaimana Survey Tahap-2 ini merupakan survey tindak-lanjut dengan anda tentang survey sebelumnya, dan kami akan sangat menbghargai jika anda dapat melengkapi daftar pertanyaan hari ini. Kami memahami bahwa ini adalah waktu yang sangat menyibukkan tahun ini, tetapi adalah hal yang sangat penting bahwa informasi tentang asset dan kapabilitas perusahaan anda termasuk dalam studi kami untuk memberi gambaran yang luas tentang bisnis konstruksi yang beroperasi di Indonesia. Survei ini memerlukan waktu sekitar 15 - 30 menit untuk dilengkapi baik versi cetak (offline) maupun online versi Bahasa Indonesia dan English version
Untuk melengkapi survei ini, dimohon untuk memperhatikan instruksi sebagai berikut:
1. Survey ini akan mengkaji hubungan antara asset, kapabilititas dan kinerja perusahaan, kami menganjurkan untuk dengan singkat membaca semua faktor di Bagian Pertama, dan Daftar definisi yg tersedia sebelum membuat tanggapan akhir.
2. Untuk setiap item pertanyaan, mohon lingkari nomor yang tepat sesuai dengan jawaban anda. Terdapat tiga (3) bagian untuk diselesaikan ( Section/Bagian I, II, dan III)
3. Semua informasi dari sini akan diperlakukan dengan sangat rahasia. Semua data yang terkumpul akan dianalisa dan semua informasi tentang perusahaan/responden akan disimpan terpisah dari data survey.
4. Jika nada berkenan untuk menerima souvenir dan ringkasan hasil survey dari kami, mohon mengisi data respondend pada tempat yang tersedia di bagian akhir survey ini (hal.9).
5. Dimohon untuk melengkapi survey ini paling lambat pada hari Jumat, tanggal 25 April 2009 jika memungkinkan.. Survei yang telah diselesaikan agar dikirim melalu fax atau surat elektronik kepada M. Sapri Pamulu / Stephen Kajewski, BEE-QUT Brisbane, Australia 4001, Fax +61-7-31381170 (Internasional) or +62-21-7817235 (Lokal) atau email to m.pamulu@qut.edu.au
Terima kasih atas partisipasi dan kerjasamanya. M.Sapri Pamulu
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Indonesia Infrastructure Report Q1 2009
In time for the launch of BMI’s infrastructure Q109 reports we have revised our construction data. The data has been modified from 2008 onwards. This initiative stems from new methodology being introduced in our forecasting method and aims to increase the relevance and reliability of BMI’s infrastructure data. BMI strives to be able to offer five year industry forecasts for the Indonesia Q109report however that data is not currently available, but it will be updated in time for Q209. BMI therefore will make its predictions based on data sets from 2009-2012.
Sunday, June 29, 2008
Indonesia Infrastructure Report Q2 2008 (Abstract)
Indonesia, South East Asia’s largest economy, is home to a vibrant construction industry and is witnessing increased investment flows into its infrastructure sector as the state strives to improve thestatutory framework - making domestic infrastructure projects more attractive and bankable for investors.This report forecasts that the construction industry is likely to experience an average annual growth rateof 5.74% over the 2008-2012 forecast period.
There is a mix of small, medium and large companies operating in Indonesia’s construction industry.Some of the largest Indonesian firms are members of the Contractors’ Association (AKI). These are theplayers that are expected to undertake major government projects and compete with internationalconstruction companies, both in the domestic and international
markets.
In the current year, the central government has allocated nearly 20% of the overall budget expenditure topublic infrastructure development. Moreover, with projects worth more than US$100bn in the pipeline,Indonesia’s domestic construction industry looks set to experience robust growth, in line with economicexpansion. In a recent presidential address on the draft 2008 state budget, it was indicated that budgetaryallocations to the transport and public works
departments will be increased significantly. It is estimated that in the period 2005-2010, the Indonesian infrastructure sector would require over US$150bn infunding, and a large part of this will have to be raised purely through foreign and domestic private investment.
However, Indonesia is plagued by a few negatives. Primary among these is its business operating environment - considered among the poorest in Asia. Investors often have to contend with securityconcerns and poor governance characterised by widespread corruption, lack of transparency, poor legalcompliance and a highly inefficient tax regime.
Some players from nations such as Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are still wary of financing projects or investing directly in Indonesia. Costly labour is cited as one reason. Another problem that is encounteredhas to do with the credibility of Indonesian banks. With the lack of funding and limited big-projectexposure, it is uncertain whether the nation’s own construction companies will be successful in capturingthese lucrative market opportunities.
Banks are still cautious about extending credit to the construction industry. Aside from a shortage of funds, most Indonesian contractors still operate equipment purchased before the 1997 monetary crisis.Such equipment falls short of today’s requirements for speed and high-quality work.
That notwithstanding, BMI analysis indicates that on account of its vast untapped opportunities, the Indonesian construction industry value is expected to reach about US$38.76bn in 2008 and rise toUS$44.4bn in 2012. Moreover, in BMI’s Infrastructure Business Environment Ratings for Asia,Indonesia manages a net score of 50. (Business Monitor International, 2008)
There is a mix of small, medium and large companies operating in Indonesia’s construction industry.Some of the largest Indonesian firms are members of the Contractors’ Association (AKI). These are theplayers that are expected to undertake major government projects and compete with internationalconstruction companies, both in the domestic and international
markets.
In the current year, the central government has allocated nearly 20% of the overall budget expenditure topublic infrastructure development. Moreover, with projects worth more than US$100bn in the pipeline,Indonesia’s domestic construction industry looks set to experience robust growth, in line with economicexpansion. In a recent presidential address on the draft 2008 state budget, it was indicated that budgetaryallocations to the transport and public works
departments will be increased significantly. It is estimated that in the period 2005-2010, the Indonesian infrastructure sector would require over US$150bn infunding, and a large part of this will have to be raised purely through foreign and domestic private investment.
However, Indonesia is plagued by a few negatives. Primary among these is its business operating environment - considered among the poorest in Asia. Investors often have to contend with securityconcerns and poor governance characterised by widespread corruption, lack of transparency, poor legalcompliance and a highly inefficient tax regime.
Some players from nations such as Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are still wary of financing projects or investing directly in Indonesia. Costly labour is cited as one reason. Another problem that is encounteredhas to do with the credibility of Indonesian banks. With the lack of funding and limited big-projectexposure, it is uncertain whether the nation’s own construction companies will be successful in capturingthese lucrative market opportunities.
Banks are still cautious about extending credit to the construction industry. Aside from a shortage of funds, most Indonesian contractors still operate equipment purchased before the 1997 monetary crisis.Such equipment falls short of today’s requirements for speed and high-quality work.
That notwithstanding, BMI analysis indicates that on account of its vast untapped opportunities, the Indonesian construction industry value is expected to reach about US$38.76bn in 2008 and rise toUS$44.4bn in 2012. Moreover, in BMI’s Infrastructure Business Environment Ratings for Asia,Indonesia manages a net score of 50. (Business Monitor International, 2008)
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
BUMN Konstruksi Masih Mendominasi
Indikator kesehatan perusahaan bisa dilihat dari rasio keuangan dan kesehatan perusahaan
SEJATINYA meski tidak kentara, persaingan industri jasa konstruksi bisa dikatakan kompetitif. Pemainnya pun beragam ada swasta seperti PT Total Bangun Persada, dan PT Bangun Tjipta serta BUMN seperti PT Adhi Karya Tbk, PT Wijaya Karya Tbk, PT Waskita Karya, PT Hutama Karya, PT Istaka Karya dan PT Nindya Karya.
Kendati perusahaan jasa konstruksi berstatus pelat merah lebih mendominasi, secara pencitraan, publik atau masyarakat lebih akrab dengan Total Bangun Persada maupun swasta lainnya.
Namun sesungguhnya kiprah BUMN relatif besar. Ini bisa disaksikan dari banyaknya gedung perkantoran mentereng, perumahan, apartemen khususnya di
Memang tidak semua perusahaan jasa konstruksi BUMN memiliki kinerja baik. Hanya beberapa saja yang terkenal seperti Adhi Karya, dan Wijaya Karya.
Lantas bagaimana dengan BUMN kosntruksi lainnya? PT Pembangunan Perumahan (PP), diakui banyak pihak sebagai yang terbaik untuk urusan bangun-membangun gedung atau properti sejenis. Wajar saja karena sejak didirikan tahun 1953 dia telah diposisikan sebagai kontraktor perumahan (housing) dan gedung tinggi.
Pengakuan atas kualitas produk yang dihasilkan bisa dilihat dari diraihnya sertifikat ISO 9001:2000. PP juga sekaligus menjadi perusahaan kontraktor pertama di
Selama berkiprah, PP sudah membangun ratusan gedung, apartemen, hotel di DKI
Hingga kini PP masih lebih mengkhususkan diri pada pengerjaan bangunan ketimbang yang lain seperti jembatan, irigasi, dll. Ini bisa dilihat dari tipe pekerjaannya, tahun 2003, PP menyelesaikan 650 pekerjaan konstruksi bangunan dari total 994 pekerjaan, atau sekitar 65 persen. Untuk tahun 2004, PP menargetkan menyelesaikan 64,5 persen pekerjaan bangunan yang ditangani (675 pekerjaan bangunan berbanding total 1.044 pekerjaan).
Menurut Bambang Tri Wibowo, Direktur Operasi PP, pihaknya kini masuk peringkat tiga besar di antara sembilan BUMN konstruksi. Bahkan tahun 2006, PP dinobatkan sebagai BUMN terbaik. Prestasi ini bukan diraih dengan mudah. Untuk mencapai posisi ini, PP harus jatuh bangun.
Dia mencontohkan ketika memasuki krisis moneter tahun 1998, PP mengalami masa-masa teramat sulit. Ketika itu, perusahaan mengalami tiga cobaan sekaligus.
Pertama adalah tidak mendapatkan proyek, kedua proyek yang sudah ada tidak bisa berlanjut, karena tidak ada kas masuk. Di tengah kesulitan ini, PP tetap diwajibkan untuk bisa mengerjakan sesuai dengan kontrak. Sedangkan ketiga adalah melonjaknya harga barang-barang.
Dari sisi eksternal, permasalahan juga cukup pelik. Saat itu, para supplier berlomba-lomba untuk menagih utang. Bambang Triwibowo, yang saat ini menjabat sebagai Direktur Operasi PP, turut berjuang bersama perusahaan ini untuk melalui masa-masa paceklik.
Untuk menyelesaikan masalah itu, PP menggunakan berbagai cara. Langkah pertama yang dilakukan adalah menyelesaikan masalah internal. “Di cabang-cabang, kami mengajak karyawan untuk mengurangi gaji. Kami sendiri (Kepala Cabang) mengurangi gaji dan diikuti di bawahnya,” katanya ketika ditemui Jurnal Nasional di ruang kerjanya beberapa waktu lalu.
Bagaimana menyelesaikan masalah eksternal? Bambang mengaku menghindari supplier datang untuk menagih utang. “Saya sampaikan bahwa kami belum bisa bayar. Saya minta mereka menunggu dan saat kami bangkit lagi nanti,” kata dia menjelaskan.
Bagi supplier yang tidak percaya, ia menawarkan untuk menjual dengan sangat murah real estate dan tanah yang dimiliki PP.
Menurut dia, cara ini cukup efektif. Dengan demikian, PP memperoleh banyak keuntungan dari segi cash flow dan perumahan mereka juga laku terjual.
Sedangkan bagi pembeli yang bandel yang tidak mau membayar pada PP, dia mengadukan ke Kejaksaan Agung (Kejakgung). “Akhirnya kami selamat.
Lebih lanjut dia mengatakan, saat ini, PP seperti sebuah pohon. “Pohon itu harus dirawat supaya sehat. Namun sehat saja belum cukup. Selain sehat, pohon juga harus tumbuh dengan baik, supaya berbuah.”
Indikator kesehatan dari perusahaan bisa dilihat dari rasio-rasio keuangan maupun rasio-rasio kesehatan perusahaan. Pemasaran, penjualan, pemasukan setelah pajak PP, saat ini tumbuh sekitar 18 persen per tahun. “Untuk mendukung ini semua, kami terus-menerus memikirkan strategi pengembangan sumber daya manusia. Karena tuntutan target perusahaan yang selalu naik dari tahun ke tahun. Padahal keadaan pasar tidak bisa dipastikan. Maka tidak bisa tidak, perusahaan harus memikirkan langkah-langkah pengembangan, supaya ada sumber-sumber pemasukan lain, bila usaha jasa kosntruksi sudah di posisi maksimal,” ucapnya.
Karena itu PP membuat usaha baru, yang berupa investasi jalan Tol bersama PT Citra Marga Nusaphala Persada TBK (CMNP), PT Waskita Karya, dan PT Hutama Karya, untuk ruas Tol Depok - Antasari. Selain itu, PP juga berusaha dengan anak-anak perusahaan yg lain. Misalnya dengan PT Mitra Pola Sarana untuk penyewaan gedung. Juga usaha-usaha di bidang developer, dengan melihat semua aspek secara hati-hati. “Namun, bila kita melihat angka-angka APBN yang selalu naik nilainya. Belum lagi infrastruktur yang mendapat prioritas tinggi, maka kami melihat bisnis jasa konstruksi nasional masih sangat menjanjikan,” kata pria yang hobi nonton teater ini.
Setelah PP, nama yang sering menjadi langganan developer adalah PT Wijaya Karya (Wika). Berdiri tahun 1960, buah karya (masterpiece) dari Wika bisa dijumpai di
Tidak bisa dilupakan nama-nama lain yang cukup dikenal dalam pengerjaan konstruksi khususnya property yakni PT Nindya Karya dan PT Hutama Karya.
Thursday, May 15, 2008
POLL: Permasalahan Bisnis Konstruksi Indonesia
Dari anasir-anasir berikut, yang mana saja yang merupakan masalah dalam berkegiatan di sektor usaha/bisnis jasa konstruksi di Indonesia? (Diolah dari LPJK 2007: Konstruksi Indonesia, Editor: Dr. A. Suraji)
Friday, April 11, 2008
Survei Bisnis Konstruksi Indonesia (diperpanjang)
Dear All,
Sekaitan dengan survei penelitian saya terdahulu tentang strategi perusahaan konstruksi (AEC) di Indonesia, saya masih mengundang bapak/ibu untuk meluangkan waktunya dalam mengisi survey online pada alamat situs berikut
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=li37mkq2surpuyt326397 (Bahasa Indonesia)
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=re341rvlfcw8flk317462 (English)
Survei ini akan terbuka hingga 30 Juni 2008.
Sebagai penghargaan atas partisipasi bapak/ibu, saya akan mengirimkan souvenir dari Brisbane bersama ringkasan hasil survey pada akhir July 2008.
Atas partisipasi dan dukungan bapak/ibu, saya mengucapkan terima kasih.
Best Regards,
Sapri Pamulu
BNE Contact:
Cellular
+61 402155808
Email mspamulu@yahoo.com.au
Sekaitan dengan survei penelitian saya terdahulu tentang strategi perusahaan konstruksi (AEC) di Indonesia, saya masih mengundang bapak/ibu untuk meluangkan waktunya dalam mengisi survey online pada alamat situs berikut
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=li37mkq2surpuyt326397 (Bahasa Indonesia)
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=re341rvlfcw8flk317462 (English)
Survei ini akan terbuka hingga 30 Juni 2008.
Sebagai penghargaan atas partisipasi bapak/ibu, saya akan mengirimkan souvenir dari Brisbane bersama ringkasan hasil survey pada akhir July 2008.
Atas partisipasi dan dukungan bapak/ibu, saya mengucapkan terima kasih.
Best Regards,
Sapri Pamulu
BNE Contact:
Cellular
+61 402155808Email mspamulu@yahoo.com.au
Monday, July 02, 2007
online survey on strategic management practices in Indonesia construction industry
Dear Sir/ Madam,
I’m currently undertaking a Doctoral Degree in Project Management at Queensland University of Technology (QUT) Brisbane, Australia. In fulfilment of this PhD degree, I’m required to have a research project, and produce a dissertation. The purpose of this project is to explore present characterization of strategic management practices in the Indonesia construction enterprises.
I would be very grateful if you could complete this questionnaire online at:
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=re341rvlfcw8flk317462 (English)
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=e4740w5luo4y99c317481 (Bahasa)
I request your assistance because your company is a construction company that member of Assosiasi Kontraktor Indonesia (AKI) and/or Gabungan Pelaksana Konstruksi Nasional Seluruh Indonesia (GAPENSI).
Needless to say, all comments and responses provided will be treated with strict confidence and individual firms will not be identified. Equally, a copy of the summary report will be available to the cooperating firms.
Please contact my principal supervisor, A/Professor Stephen Kajewski on s.kajewski@qut.edu.au to have any questions answered or if you require further information about the research project.
Yours truly,
M. Sapri Pamulu
Centre for Built Environment & Engineering Research
Queensland University of Technology
2 George Street GPO Box 2434 Brisbane QLD 4001 Australia
Phone +61-7-31388310 Fax +61-7-31381277 Mobile +61-402155808
Email m.pamulu@qut.edu.au Web http://sapri.blogspot.com
I’m currently undertaking a Doctoral Degree in Project Management at Queensland University of Technology (QUT) Brisbane, Australia. In fulfilment of this PhD degree, I’m required to have a research project, and produce a dissertation. The purpose of this project is to explore present characterization of strategic management practices in the Indonesia construction enterprises.
I would be very grateful if you could complete this questionnaire online at:
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=re341rvlfcw8flk317462 (English)
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=e4740w5luo4y99c317481 (Bahasa)
I request your assistance because your company is a construction company that member of Assosiasi Kontraktor Indonesia (AKI) and/or Gabungan Pelaksana Konstruksi Nasional Seluruh Indonesia (GAPENSI).
Needless to say, all comments and responses provided will be treated with strict confidence and individual firms will not be identified. Equally, a copy of the summary report will be available to the cooperating firms.
Please contact my principal supervisor, A/Professor Stephen Kajewski on s.kajewski@qut.edu.au to have any questions answered or if you require further information about the research project.
Yours truly,
M. Sapri Pamulu
Centre for Built Environment & Engineering Research
Queensland University of Technology
2 George Street GPO Box 2434 Brisbane QLD 4001 Australia
Phone +61-7-31388310 Fax +61-7-31381277 Mobile +61-402155808
Email m.pamulu@qut.edu.au Web http://sapri.blogspot.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
